Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 04:28
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
John Stamos reveals he broke news of Brian Wilson's death to Mike Love - ABC News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How to see Mars visit a bright star and the moon this June - Space
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
The Simple Rule That Seems To Govern How Life Is Organized On Earth - IFLScience
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Deion Sanders: Pre-draft attacks on Shedeur and Shilo "hurt" - NBC Sports
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Here’s why exercise is so important if you’re a cancer survivor - The Washington Post
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.